San Diego Green Building Council Unveils 10 Homes to be Featured on 2016 Green Homes Tour on Nov. 12
SAN DIEGO (OCT 25, 2016) – The San Diego Green Building Council (SDGBC), an environmental nonprofit dedicated to providing education, outreach and advocacy focused on green building in the San Diego community, announced today the 10 residential projects that will be featured on the Green Homes Tour on Saturday, Nov. 12. Home sites are located throughout the county, including Mission Hills, Pacific Beach, Poway, Ocean Beach, Leucadia, Chula Vista, Ramona, Jamul and Campo.
Now in its seventh year, the event brings together hundreds of members of the local community to celebrate best practices in green building and design while showcasing the innovative work of some of the industry’s top professionals. The diverse projects include sustainably remodeled residences, urban multifamily developments, luxurious custom homes and many projects that have achieved or are seeking LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification, the top third-party verification system for sustainable structures around the world.
On the self-guided tour (which runs from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.), attendees may visit as many of the homes as they would like, meet with industry professionals and learn more about the latest green home design, construction and upgrade options. Each eco-friendly project features a number of innovative, high-performance design features including impact areas such as energy, water conservation, building materials, indoor air quality, landscaping, and sustainable building sites.
Tickets are on sale now at http://www.usgbc-sd.org/event-2296833. Green Building Council members are $10 and non-members are $15. Students are $5 (with I.D.) and children under 16 are free.
The 2016 spotlight projects include:
· Casa Aguila (Ramona) – This single-family home is LEED Platinum certified and a DOE Challenge Home. It is the first Southern California “Passive House” home and the first in San Diego County to supply 100 percent of its indoor potable water from rainwater and use recycled blackwater for irrigation.
· Fallgren Naturally Healthy Home (Campo) – Constructed from straw bales, straw clay, adobe block, clay plaster and other natural materials, this home provides a welcoming shelter from the extreme heat and cold of the high desert community of the East County. The owners are currently seeking Living Building Challenge Net Zero Building/Petal Certification.
· Lofts on Landis (Chula Vista) – This new 33-unit affordable housing community in the city’s downtown was built using an integrated design that incorporated sustainability at all stages of development, including principles of smart growth and a “whole systems” approach to construction. It exceeds Title 24 energy-efficiency requirements by 34.9 percent and has achieved LEED Platinum certification, EPA Indoor airPLUS, EPA Energy Star, California Advanced Homes and New Solar Homes Partnership status.
· The Shed (Leucadia) – This four-unit infill project combines private residences with a central space for communal gatherings, bringing a welcome improvement to the previously rundown property. The nearly-completed project features energy- and water-efficient design choices as well as extensive use of recycled, natural and low-emission materials, is seeking GreenPoint Rated certification.
· Dimock Residence (Pacific Beach) – This GreenPoint-rated (gold level) single-family home underwent a down-to-the-studs remodel with additions, featuring sustainably harvested and salvaged lumber, FSC certified and nontoxic materials, water-saving fixtures, smart technology and California-native, drought-tolerant landscaping.
· Szulc Residence (Poway) – A single-family home with 270-degree mountain views features blue jean insulation, solar panels, rain water catchment/graywater system and multiple Solatube daylighting units. It was featured in the “150 Best Sustainable House Ideas” book published by Harper Design in 2013.
· Clea House (Mission Hills) – This secluded, 4,000-square-foot, hilltop home seamlessly blends modern design, luxury living and green building features. The lines between nature and architecture blur as the home’s innovative mid-century-inspired design captures the shifting light, fresh breezes and 270-degree views from a 1,100-square-foot rooftop deck.
· Tourmaline House (Pacific Beach) – Perched above the Pacific Ocean with large decks and sweeping views, this new, single-family spec homes features extensive green building and design choices throughout and is currently seeking LEED certification.
· O’Brien Residence (Ocean Beach) – This GreenPoint-rated home is undergoing an extensive whole-house remodel and addition and features a high-efficiency furnace and water heater, energy-efficient windows, advanced waterproofing systems, solar power system, low-water landscape, drip irrigation and graywater system, and extensive use of sustainable and recycled materials.
· Alta Loma (Jamul) – This unique single-family home for sale in San Diego’s back-country features energy-efficient straw bale construction with adobe and clay plaster interior walls. The home is situated to take advantage of natural air ventilation in order to maintain indoor comfort without heating or air conditioning systems. The interior floor plan revolves around a central pond and massive boulder providing thermal mass, and the property offers views of the adjacent nature reserve and diverse surrounding geography. A 1,000-foot-deep well provides all of the water for the home.
A Green Homes Tour map and complete list of this year’s projects, including photos and building additional details, can be found at the San Diego Building Council’s website.
The Green Homes Tour is made possible by a committee of industry volunteers and the generous financial support of local sustainability-minded businesses, including Xpera Group (premier event sponsor) and Alliance Green Builders.
Additional sponsorship opportunities are still available by contacting Bryon Stafford, this year’s Green Homes Tour coordinator, at (619) 955-9208 or email@example.com.
The San Diego Green Building Council is a 501(C)3 environmental nonprofit dedicated to providing education, outreach and advocacy surrounding green building in the San Diego region. It is the San Diego Chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council, whose mission is to inspire, educate and collaborate within communities to transform the built environment toward true sustainability. More information is available at http://www.usgbc.org/ (national website) and http://usgbc-sd.org/ (local website).
Over 75 chapter, staff, student and parent volunteers came together on April 9, 2016 for a Spring Green Apple Day of Service event at St. Rita's School in San Diego, CA.
Services performed, during this event co-sponsorted by Kitchell, included building a school learning garden, planting five shade trees and privacy hedges, and fence repairs. Additional sponsors included Casper Company, Davis Consulting, Tree San Diego, Urban Corps, RCP Block & Brick, Jimbo's Naturally and Mindswing Consulting.
Trees for this event were donated by Tree San Diego and made possible through funding provided by the California Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund through the CALFIRE Urban and Community Program.
Green Apple Day of Service is part of an internationally recognized series of events focused on making our schools sustainable and healthier places for our children.
Author: Barbara Fanning is a member of the San Diego Green Building Council Board of Directors and the chair of the Green Schools Committee.
Bill McKibben is the co-founder of 350.org, and an author and educator around sustainability and climate change reduction. He offers unique ways of looking at all of the impacts and considerations necessary to a true and transparent conversation around climate change. In his newest article (Global Warming's Terrifying New Chemistry), McKibben makes the claim that unforeseen (at least publicly unforeseen) methane emissions from fracking may completely offset any and all CO2 emission reductions from increasing natural gas use for powering our country. In 2014, his article (Global Warming's Terrifying New Math) posited that our biggest challenge to industry transformation is the billions dollars of future investments in fossil fuels still in the ground. His insight and ability to see the whole picture, make McKibben extremely valuable for understanding the reality of environmental awareness and a path to a sustainable future.
I find this particularly enlightening - if we don't consider the full scope of a decision or solution, and solicit expertise from the best minds in each area, we'll never understand the total impact we might have, whether restorative or destructive! It is imperative to at least consider, in a thought exercise or hopefully something more impactful, the potential web of connections that might happen once we move forward. In addition to broadening our planning and analysis, and bringing in appropriate expertise, it's always best to have measurable metrics to inform whatever progress might happen. As the old adage goes, we can't manage what we don't measure. It becomes clear that true success requires a clear picture of all impacts, as well as defining key metrics and goals for monitoring ongoing performance.
What this means at the Building Scale: In the green building industry, we talk about the Integrative Process as a "holy grail" of project design, construction, and operations. How can we make a decision about fine-tuning the sizing of an HVAC system, if we don't understand the building envelope (how much conditioned air will seep out of the building, or outdoor air will seep in)? The intent of the Integrative Process is to align industry professionals and their expertise; which can result in interconnected building systems that operate most efficiently together, and are appropriately sized (and also priced); and finally to result in a building optimizing its site, climate, and surrounding culture - all in a way that bests serves building occupants. This also requires us to set appropriate metrics, to define and measure "value" to occupants, and define and measure intended building performance in all areas.
What this means at an industry scale: Looking at the green building industry itself, as mentioned above, integrative process and design have been the focus of new approaches for diverse teams to reach unified and optimized performance goals. Integrative Process is a buzzword in the sustainability industry, has a credit in the LEEDv4 rating systems and represented in the Living Building Challenge, as well as a frequent topic at conferences like GreenBuild and Living Future. However, without a clear picture of how the building design, construction, and operations industries work - we won't know any future opportunities or barriers to adoption of the integrative process as a general practice. One example is the idea of a 'shared liability clause'. This allows project team members to operate "out of their comfort zone", by understanding that the whole team shares liability on whatever is delivered, and making the project a safe place to specify strategies that are not general practice. At this scale, we can understand interactions within the building, examples of new strategies, and develop templates for charrettes and integrative process - but until we consider how this will be adopted and who will be impacted, we can't expect anything to be used.
What this means at a Global Scale: The example from McKibben's article demonstrates why it's even more important to paint a broad picture at a global scale. Proponents of natural gas extraction (primarily through hydraulic fracturing, or fracking), have latched onto the idea that we can bring jobs and economic success back to the US, along with a 'bridge' fuel that releases less CO2 emissions than coal-fired power plants. Additionally, advances in engineering reduce the cost of extracting this fuel. However, it has recently been discovered (as mentioned in McKibben's article) that methane leakage from natural gas will offset any greenhouse gas emission reductions, and that fracking would in fact be more harmful as a system to climate change, than originally thought. Without a defined goal and specific metrics, and without a whole picture of all impacts and an integrative approach - we would never know that our 'clean natural gas' strategies have in fact had more negative impact on climate change than good.
A little bit of background, and more about the two mentioned McKibben articles:
A few years back, Bill McKibben published an article with the Rolling Stone called "Global Warming's Terrifying New Math", which added a new lens to the climate change reduction movement of truly understanding the economic factors involved in the fossil fuel extraction industry. Specifically, as we seek to implement readily available energy technologies and positively disrupt the energy generation framework in the US and globally, we'll at some point have to address the fact that the top 5 oil companies in the world have already invested billions of dollars in futures related to oil still in the ground. While I feel (somewhat harshly) that these companies made a big gamble, and if the market drives a different direction, well, too bad - we as a society can make the transition more pleasant and all-inclusive if we can find an innovative way to address these investments and keep fossil fuels in the ground.
Most recently, another lens was added, this time to fracking for natural gas. McKibben's new article published in the Nation, "Global Warming's Terrifying New Chemistry", tackles the issue of methane leakage from fracking processes and sites throughout the US.
For a moment, let's set aside the social and ecological (and geological) concerns over fracking. The fact that fracking is happening in close proximity to low-income or tribal nations, is extremely harmful for groundwater quality, creates a huge risk in the storage and conveyance of a combustible fuel, and is still a non-renewable resource, aren't part of this new lens on climate change. Instead, McKibben looks at the risk of methane emissions from fracking and distribution. Cornell researchers took it upon themselves to ask this question, and have proved that a 3 percent leakage could completely offset any CO2 emissions reductions from the use of natural gas. Additionally, he mentions that there was no data available from fracking companies, so these researchers had to measure using satellite data and expected methane release. Unfortunately, measured leakage is higher than 3%, and thus it becomes crucial that we begin measuring at all fracking sites.
Where this conversation goes next I am excited to see. Hopefully, armed with metrics and a holistic and broad-based understanding, our decision-makers and general public can make more informed decisions about our country's energy future, and it's various impacts.
[ ASIDE - The issues listed above about fracking, set aside for this conversation, are however the main reasons why a triple bottom line approach is necessary in all economy for a sustainable future (socially equitable, financially profitable, and ecologically responsible). I am personally motivated by the fact that solving issues addressing climate change can also solve ecological health, social equity and health, and national security issues. My hope is that all the incentives aligned around a logical path for growth will create enough momentum to make things happen on the scale necessary. ]
Thanks for listening,
Ravi Bajaj, Education Manager
Sustainability in the East Village - a conversation with Globe St. and John Ambert (BNIM Architects)
How The East Village Is Promoting Sustainability
The East Village neighborhood of Downtown San Diego will focus on improving key “green” indicators including energy, water, mobility, economy, health, streetscape vitality and waste, San Diego Green Building Council volunteer John Ambert tells GlobeSt.com. Ambert, AIA LEED AP BD+C, artchitecture, with BNIM, recently moderated a panel discussion here, hosted by SDGBC, about opportunities and obstacles to implementation of smart growth, net-zero water and energy developments and the facilitation of innovative partnerships in this neighborhood. We spoke exclusively with Ambert about sustainability in the East Village and how the organization is getting involved in this market.
GlobeSt.com: How is the East Village promoting sustainability?
Ambert: The East Village area of Downtown San Diego is starting a unique transformation process towards the development of a smart community—a transformation that will investigate the economic, environmental, and social health of the land and residents within. This transformation toward a more sustainable neighborhood can take many forms, but ultimately it focuses on improve key “green” indicators including energy, water, mobility, economy, health, streetscape vitality and waste.
There are many players in the East Village area that are working to improve the health of the eastern edge of Downtown. The Downtown Community Planning Group, San Diego East Village Association, and the East Village Business Improvement District all work together to support and promote East Village businesses by establishing the community as a livable urban village. In addition, there are currently two large developments in the East Village working to create unique and diverse neighborhoods in the area: The I.D.E.A. District and Makers Quarter. Both of these developments aim to blend arts, culture, education and entertainment in order to create vibrant and diverse communities in this region. In addition, the City of San Diego recently completed a climate action plan that requires the city to significantly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by 2035. All of these players are working to create a revival in the East Village, but are currently working independently to do so.
Thus, there is a huge opportunity for these developers, community organizations and city planners to develop comprehensive community initiatives for addressing the complex social problems of the East Village area, which include homelessness, public health and environmental quality. By addressing these challenges with an integrated design process that evaluates these issues over the long term, the East Village has the chance to become a truly sustainable community that can be a model for surrounding neighborhoods.
GlobeSt.com: What is the San Diego Green Building Council’s involvement with this cause?
Ambert: The San Diego Green Building Council is an environmental non-profit dedicated to providing education, outreach, and advocacy surrounding green building in the San Diego community. Our mission is to inspire, educate and collaborate within our community to transform our built environment toward true sustainability.
In terms of the work occurring in the East Village area, the SDGBC provides education and promotes collaboration between the community, the City, and the development teams in order to assist in the development of green buildings and smart-cities initiatives. We are interested in working with the different teams to analyze the challenges and opportunities in creating high-performance green buildings and developing the neighborhoods in the East Village into model communities that demonstrate district-scale sustainability. Our goal is to assist the San Diego community groups in creating a healthy, resilient, and sustainable downtown by providing information, education and connectivity to the orchestrators of other successful communities around the country.
GlobeSt.com: What can other growing urban submarkets learn from what is being done in the East Village?
Ambert: Growing urban submarkets can learn from the activities currently underway in the East Village area by taking a similar proactive approach to long-range planning and by developing a set of comprehensive community initiatives for their specific region. CCIs should be evaluated at the many scales of the community in order to determine the best magnitude of each individual initiative.
The process involves the evaluation of both state and city code as well as local policies to ensure they all support the same long-term vision for the region. It addition, this process requires input from a diverse group of stakeholders including community groups, development teams and municipal representatives in order to get the whole perspective of the complex challenges in creating a healthy and socially equitable communities.
In addition, growing urban submarkets should look to precedents from around the country for implementing sustainable strategies at the community scale. The LEED Neighborhood Development (NC) Program, Eco-Districts, 2030 Districts, and Smart Cities Initiatives are all different ways of looking at improving the health and resiliency of communities with different performance targets. Each community will have different initiatives and therefore should craft a sustainability plan that aligns with the needs of their specific region.
GlobeSt.com: What else should our readers know about sustainability in urban developments?
Ambert: Sustainability in urban developments can be implemented at a variety of scales. Individual buildings, neighborhoods and whole communities can take advantage of solutions that improve the quality of life for the residents, community and local ecology. District solutions often align better with the economies-of-scale concept, where the cost advantages and efficiencies are realized at greater scales. These type of solutions require communities, developers and municipalities to work together in evaluating the correct scale for each initiative.
Homeowners, planning groups, town councils, community leaders and development partners all play a part in working to implement sustainable solutions in their communities. All of these players should be working within a policy framework to conserve water, generate energy, preserve natural environments, create active urban centers and improve the walkability and bike-ability of their communities.
Lastly, sustainability does not have to be just about green buildings; rather, it can take on a variety of shapes and forms that go beyond the built environment. Sustainability involves all the things that make up communities and all of the complex challenges that come with them. Health, social equity, and economic vitality are all intimately connected, and it is when people look beyond the traditional bottom line of profit vs. loss that these complexities can be re-evaluated as a part of a larger system and addressed as such. When we expand the concept of sustainability into a conversation about helping people, the economy and the environment, we can take advantage of overlapping synergies that result from broader-stroke approaches to planning and urban design.